Sterile endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide: case report and literature review.

Objectives: The first purpose is to present the diagnosis and therapeutic approach in a patient with sterile endophthalmitis associated with triamcinolone acetonide injection. The secondary objective is to assess the incidence of this complication and to summarize the risk factors described in the literature. Case presentation: A 76-year-old male patient presented for painless, unilateral, decreased visual acuity, four days after cataract surgery and simultaneously intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection for diabetic macular edema in the right eye. The diagnosis of sterile endophthalmitis was made. Eight days after the presentation, the symptoms subsided, the maximum corrected visual acuity reaching that before the procedures. Discussions: The incidence of sterile endophthalmitis varies in the literature between 0% and 23.8%. Visual prognosis is good, although the pathogenesis is not fully understood. Preservatives in injectable solutions have been suggested, however, there are studies in which inflammation was also present with preservative-free products. The particle size of triamcinolone was analyzed, demonstrating an association between smaller particles and an increased frequency of adverse reactions of this type. History of uveitis, posterior capsule rupture following cataract surgery, and Irvine-Gass syndrome are other associations described. Conclusion: The physiopathological mechanism of sterile endophthalmitis is not fully understood. However, the visual prognosis is good, the final vision being dependent on the underlying pathology.

Evaluation of clinical outcomes of raised intraocular pressure following intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection.

Aim: To assess the incidence, risk factors, and treatment outcomes in intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection (IVTA) induced intraocular pressure rise and to compare IOP rise in 1-mg and 2-mg IVTA. Materials and methods: Prospective observational study conducted in all eyes receiving IVTA. Any pre-existing glaucoma and patients who received IVTA or dexamethasone implant in the last 6 months were excluded. Results: 9 between 61-70 years of age developed an IOP spike. The mean and standard deviation of age in years was 61.95 ± 8.70. Maximum eyes had ME due to Diabetic Retinopathy (53.3%). All cases of uveitic ME were reported to have an IOP spike. 2 out of 3 high myopic eyes and 1 eye with thyroid abnormality had an IOP spike. High IOP was found in 13 eyes, with more than 25 mm Hg rise in 4 eyes and more than 5 mm Hg rise from baseline IOP in 9 eyes. The mean and standard deviation of time taken for IOP raise (in days) was 46.39 ± 37.68. A total of 38 eyes received 1 mg of IVTA and the rest 22 received 2 mg of IVTA. 23.7% of 1 mg eyes experienced an IOP rise while it was 18.2% in eyes with 2 mg IVTA. The injection was repeated in 12 eyes and 41.7% developed an IOP spike among them. The independent "t" test results showed that there was a significant difference in the mean of IOP (Pre-injection) concerning the IOP rise (P=0.007*). 1 eye had IVTA crystals in the anterior chamber with raised IOP of 30 mm Hg. 1 out of 13 eyes with raised IOP needed 2 AGMs, the other 12 eyes responded well to 1 AGM. Discussion: IVTA is widely used in refractory cases of ME and steroid-induced glaucoma is the most common side effect of IVTA. To the best of our knowledge, there is a lack of literature on prospective studies on IVTA-associated risk factors, patterns of IOP elevation, and treatment outcomes. The pre-injection mean ± SD baseline IOP for uneventful eyes was 12.87±2.65 and the pre-injection mean IOP for eyes with IOP event was 15.23±2.89 (P=0.007*). Conclusion: We proposed that TA is an independent risk factor for post-intravitreal injection IOP spike. IVTA causes a maximum IOP spike at 1 to 2 months and has a protracted course that responds to anti-glaucoma medications. High baseline IOP, a repeated dose of IVTA, the presence of TA crystals in the anterior chamber, and high myopia were associated with significant IOP elevation. Abbreviations: ACD = Anterior chamber depth, AS = Anterior segment, AGM = Anti-glaucoma medications, ARMD = Age-related macular degeneration, BCVA = Best-corrected visual acuity, BRVO = Branch retinal vein occlusion, CCT = Central corneal thickness, CRVO = Central retinal vein occlusion, CME = Cystoid macular edema, CNVM = Choroidal neovascularization membrane, CSME = Clinically significant macular edema, DR = Diabetic retinopathy, ERM = Epiretinal membrane, IOP = Intraocular pressure, IGS = Irvine-Grass syndrome, GAGs = Glycosaminoglycans, IVTA = Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection, ME = Macular edema, NVG = Neovascular glaucoma, OHT = Ocular hypertension, PDS = Pigment dispersion syndrome, PACG = Primary closed angle glaucoma, POAG = Primary open-angle glaucoma, PXF = Pseudoexfoliation, VA = Visual acuity, VEGF = Vascular endothelial growth factors, VH = Vonherick's grading, SD = Standard deviation, TA = Triamcinolone acetonide, TIGR = Trabecular meshwork inducible glucocorticoid response.

Association between the response of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injection and systemic factors of diabetic macular edema.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effects of systemic factors in response to intravitreal injections in patients with macular edema due to non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients treated with intravitreal injections for macular edema secondary to NPDR between January 2018 and January 2021. The patients were divided into three groups according to the injection response. When patients with diabetic macular edema showed 20µ or more reduction in central retinal thickness compared to baseline, they were classified as responsive group, and if not, they were classified as refractory group. The responsive group was further divided into the complete and incomplete response groups. Patients with complete disappearance of edema at seven months were classified as the complete response group, whereas those in which edema did not disappear were classified as the incomplete response group. The clinical characteristics of each group, including medical history, ophthalmic examination results, and laboratory examination results at the time of diagnosis, were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 112 eyes (91 patients) that satisfied the inclusion criteria, 89 (77 patients) in the responsive group and 23 (14 patients) in the refractory group were included in the analysis. The responsive group was further divided into the complete (51 eyes) and incomplete (38 eyes) response groups. The refractory group had significantly higher glycated hemoglobin levels and significantly lower estimated glomerular filtration rates than the responsive group (p = 0.026 and p = 0.012, respectively). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, both factors were found to be significant in predicting the degree of response (all p < 0.05). No factor showed a significant difference between the incomplete and complete response groups(all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In macular edema caused by NPDR, low glomerular filtration rates and high glycated hemoglobin levels may be used as predictors of poor response to intravitreal injection therapy. In addition to blood glucose control, education should be provided regarding the need for the continuous monitoring of renal function.

Management after cataract surgery for patients with diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of various treatment modalities in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) who underwent cataract surgery. METHODS: A comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases up to December 22, 2021. The safety and efficacy of treatment modalities were assessed using the risk ratio (RR) to compare the progression of DR and the mean difference to evaluate the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and macular thickness (MT). RESULTS: The meta-analysis of the RCTs revealed that anti-VEGF (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor) drugs significantly reduced the progression of DR [RR: 0.37 (95%CI 0.19, 0.70), P = 0.002] and improved BCVA [mean difference = - 0.06 (- 0.12, - 0.01), P = 0.03] in patients with pre-existing DR who underwent cataract surgery. Steroid drugs also showed a significant reduction in macular thickness [mean difference = - 55.63 (- 90.73, - 20.53), I2 = 56%, P = 0.002] in DR patients two weeks after cataract surgery compared to the control group. The safety profiles of different management options did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis suggests that anti-VEGF drugs can effectively slow down the progression of diabetic retinopathy, improve BCVA, and reduce MT in DR patients who underwent cataract surgery. Steroid drugs also show promise in reducing MT. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are required to compare the efficacy and safety of different management options in a multi-center clinical setting.

Clinical effects of atorvastatin combined with conbercept in the treatment of patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion and carotid plaque: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs have been widely used in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO); however, recurrence is a major concern. This study aims to observe the clinical effects of atorvastatin and intravitreal therapy in the treatment of patients with branch or central RVO-ME and coexistent carotid plaques (CP). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted. Sixty-four patients diagnosed with branch or central RVO-ME and coexistent CP will be enrolled and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the control and experimental groups. The control group will be treated with intravitreal conbercept monthly for 3 months, followed by monthly evaluation and injection of pro re nata (PRN) for 12 months, while the experimental group will be treated with oral atorvastatin 20 mg daily combined with the control group treatment. If a drop of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) is more than five Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (one line) or an increment in central subfield thickness (CSFT) of 100 µm (or a 10% increment from the previous visit), intravitreal re-treatment will be performed. Outcome measurements include CSFT, BCVA, number of injections, and incidence of adverse events during the 12-month follow-up period. Differences between groups will be evaluated using Student's t-test, and comparisons between groups will be evaluated using repeated-measures analysis of variance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nanjing Lishui People's Hospital, Nanjing, China (approval number 2023KY0418-12, dated 18 April 2023), and has been registered on chictr.org.cn. Written informed consent will be collected from each patient and the results of this trial will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300071359. Registered on 12 May 2023.

Central subfield thickness of diabetic macular edema: Correlation with the aqueous humor proteome.

Purpose: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a sight-threatening complication of diabetes. Consequently, studying the proteome of DME may provide novel insights into underlying molecular mechanisms. Methods: In this study, aqueous humor samples from eyes with treatment-naïve clinically significant DME (n = 13) and age-matched controls (n = 11) were compared with label-free liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Additional aqueous humor samples from eyes with treatment-naïve DME (n = 15) and controls (n = 8) were obtained for validation by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was evaluated, and the severity of DME was measured as central subfield thickness (CST) employing optical coherence tomography. Control samples were obtained before cataract surgery. Significantly changed proteins were identified using a permutation-based calculation, with a false discovery rate of 0.05. A human donor eye with DME and a control eye were used for immunofluorescence. Results: A total of 101 proteins were differentially expressed in the DME. Regulated proteins were involved in complement activation, glycolysis, extracellular matrix interaction, and cholesterol metabolism. The highest-fold change was observed for the fibrinogen alpha chain (fold change = 17.8). Complement components C2, C5, and C8, fibronectin, and hepatocyte growth factor-like protein were increased in DME and correlated with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Ceruloplasmin and complement component C8 correlated with central subfield thickness (CST). Hemopexin, plasma kallikrein, monocyte differentiation antigen CD14 (CD14), and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) were upregulated in the DME. LBP was correlated with vascular endothelial growth factor. The increased level of LBP in DME was confirmed using ELISA. The proteins involved in desmosomal integrity, including desmocollin-1 and desmoglein-1, were downregulated in DME and correlated negatively with CST. Immunofluorescence confirmed the extravasation of fibrinogen at the retinal level in the DME. Conclusion: Elevated levels of pro-inflammatory proteins, including the complement components LBP and CD14, were observed in DME. DME was associated with the loss of basal membrane proteins, compromised desmosomal integrity, and perturbation of glycolysis.

Comparing the efficacy of glucocorticoids and anti-VEGF in treating diabetic macular edema: systematic review and comprehensive analysis.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to better understand the efficacy of various drugs, such as glucocorticoids and anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF), in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME), and to evaluate various clinical treatment regimens consisting of different therapeutic measures. Methods: This study included randomized controlled trials up to February 2023 comparing the efficacy of corticosteroid-related therapy and anti-VEGF therapy. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched, and the quality of the studies was carefully assessed. Finally, 39 studies were included. Results: Results at 3-month followup showed that intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB) + triamcinolone acetonide (TA) was the most beneficial in improving best-corrected visual acuity and reducing the thickness of macular edema in the center of the retina in patients with DME. Results at 6-month follow-up showed that intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) was the most effective in improving patients' bestcorrected visual acuity and reducing the thickness of central macular edema. Discussion: Overall, IVB+TA was beneficial in improving best-corrected visual acuity and reducing central macular edema thickness over a 3-month follow-up period, while DEX implants had a better therapeutic effect than anti-VEGF agents at 6 months, especially the patients with severe macular edema and visual acuity impaired. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=397100, identifier CRD42023397100.

Machine learning and optical coherence tomography-derived radiomics analysis to predict persistent diabetic macular edema in patients undergoing anti-VEGF intravitreal therapy.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a leading cause of vision loss in patients with diabetes. This study aimed to develop and evaluate an OCT-omics prediction model for assessing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment response in patients with DME. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 113 eyes from 82 patients with DME was conducted. Comprehensive feature engineering was applied to clinical and optical coherence tomography (OCT) data. Logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), and backpropagation neural network (BPNN) classifiers were trained using a training set of 79 eyes, and evaluated on a test set of 34 eyes. Clinical implications of the OCT-omics prediction model were assessed by decision curve analysis. Performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and AUC) were calculated. RESULTS: The logistic, SVM, and BPNN classifiers demonstrated robust discriminative abilities in both the training and test sets. In the training set, the logistic classifier achieved a sensitivity of 0.904, specificity of 0.741, F1 score of 0.887, and AUC of 0.910. The SVM classifier showed a sensitivity of 0.923, specificity of 0.667, F1 score of 0.881, and AUC of 0.897. The BPNN classifier exhibited a sensitivity of 0.962, specificity of 0.926, F1 score of 0.962, and AUC of 0.982. Similar discriminative capabilities were maintained in the test set. The OCT-omics scores were significantly higher in the non-persistent DME group than in the persistent DME group (p < 0.001). OCT-omics scores were also positively correlated with the rate of decline in central subfield thickness after treatment (Pearson's R = 0.44, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The developed OCT-omics model accurately assesses anti-VEGF treatment response in DME patients. The model's robust performance and clinical implications highlight its utility as a non-invasive tool for personalized treatment prediction and retinal pathology assessment.

Aflibercept Off-Target Effects in Diabetic Macular Edema: An In Silico Modeling Approach.

Intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) is a treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME), but its mechanism of action (MoA) has not been completely elucidated. Here, we aimed to explore IAI's MoA and its multi-target nature in DME pathophysiology with an in silico (computer simulation) disease model. We used the Therapeutic Performance Mapping System (Anaxomics Biotech property) to generate mathematical models based on the available scientific knowledge at the time of the study, describing the relationship between the modulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) by IAI and DME pathophysiological processes. We also undertook an enrichment analysis to explore the processes modulated by IAI, visualized the effectors' predicted protein activity, and specifically evaluated the role of VEGFR1 pathway inhibition on DME treatment. The models simulated the potential pathophysiology of DME and the likely IAI's MoA by inhibiting VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 signaling. The action of IAI through both signaling pathways modulated the identified pathophysiological processes associated with DME, with the strongest effects in angiogenesis, blood-retinal barrier alteration and permeability, and inflammation. VEGFR1 inhibition was essential to modulate inflammatory protein effectors. Given the role of VEGFR1 signaling on the modulation of inflammatory-related pathways, IAI may offer therapeutic advantages for DME through sustained VEGFR1 pathway inhibition.

Subthreshold laser treatment for non-center involved diabetic macular edema via non-damaging retinal laser therapy (NRT).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of subthreshold laser treatment via non-damaging retinal laser therapy (NRT) in patients with non-center involved diabetic macular edema (non-CI DME). METHODS: In this prospective controlled study, NRT with 577 nm wavelength was performed to the edematous inner subfields as needed at 3 monthly intervals, while the control group received no treatment. If CI-DME developed in either group, intravitreal anti-VEGF was performed and the eye was excluded from subsequent analysis. RESULTS: A total of 75 eyes (36 study eyes, 39 controls) were evaluated. The change in superior, nasal and temporal inner subfield thicknesses over time and between groups was found significant (P = 0.004, P < 0.001, P = 0.04 respectively). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change was not significant over time and between groups (P = 0.69). Rates of CI-DME development requiring intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment were not different during the first and second years (P = 0.171, 0.908). No laser scar was detected in any eye in fundus autofluorescence imaging. CONCLUSION: NRT performed as needed at 3 monthly intervals is effective after 21 months of follow up in the treatment of non-CI DME and it was safe. With this method, it may be foreseen that BCVA will be better preserved in the long term by avoiding the possible side effects of conventional laser.

Short-term effect of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in refractory diabetic macular edema.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the short-term effects (hours-days) of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-arm, interventional clinical series. Eyes with DME and 3-9 injections of ranibizumab without a good response were included. Patients underwent a single IDI. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, complete ophthalmic evaluation, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were performed at baseline, 2 h, 3 h, 24 h, 7 days, and 1 month. The main outcomes were change in central retinal thickness (CRT) on SD-OCT and BCVA. RESULTS: Fifteen eyes of 15 patients were included. Mean CRT decreased after treatment from 515.87 µm ± 220.00 µm at baseline to 489.60 µm ± 176.53 µm after 2 h (p = 0.126), and 450.13 µm ± 163.43 at 24 h (p = 0.006). Change in BCVA was from 0.85 ± 0.44 logMAR baseline to 0.58 ± 0.37 log MAR at 1 month (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Eyes treated with IDI showed significant decrease in CRT detectable 1 day after injection. In some patients, the effect could be observed 3 h post-implantation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05736081 . Registered 20 February 2023, Retrospectively registered.

Preserving visual acuity: a compelling 12-year case study of controlling neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

INTRODUCTION: In neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) trials, anti-VEGF injection frequency decreases after the first year, while outcomes remain primarily related to the number of injections. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports of maintaining the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) for more than 7 years in extension studies. OBJECTIVE: To report a 12-year follow-up of a real-world case of nAMD where BCVA was preserved from declining. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 67-year-old Caucasian female presented to our department in June 2010 due to decreased vision in her left eye (LE) within the preceding months. Examination showed a BCVA of 85 letters (L) in the right eye (RE) and 35 L in the LE. Fundus examination showed drusen in the macula of both eyes. Macular edema, loss of the macular lutein pigment, macular hypo/hyperpigmentation were observed in the LE. A diagnosis of Type 2 choroidal neovascular membrane (CNV) in the LE was established and within two months a Type 1 CNV developed in the RE. She undergone 9 injections of bevacizumab (six) and ranibizumab (three) within the first year of treatment in the LE and seven injections of ranibizumab within the first year in the RE. RESULTS: The LE had a mean of 5.2 injections per year, and the RE had a mean of 7.5 injections per year, from 2010 to 2022. RE's BCVA dropped by 8L (85L to 77L) and central retinal thickness (CRT) increased by 16 µm (276 µm to 292 µm) while LE's BCVA increased by 28L (35L to 63L) and CRT decreased by 369 µm (680 µm to 311 µm), at the twelfth year. CONCLUSIONS: Although the final visual outcome depends on baseline BCVA and lesion type or size, the number of injections is paramount in preserving BCVA and achieving favorable functional outcomes in nAMD, even after 12 years of treatment.

Initial response and 12-month outcomes after commencing dexamethasone or vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors for retinal vein occlusion in the FRB registry.

To compare baseline characteristics, initial response and 12-month efficacy and safety outcomes in eyes with branch and central retinal vein occlusion (BRVO and CRVO) treated with dexamethasone implants (DEX) or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) we performed a multi-centre, retrospective and observational study using Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry. Of 725 eligible eyes, 10% received DEX initially with very frequent adjunctive anti-VEGF (BRVO-DEX 49%, CRVO-DEX 60%). The primary outcome of mean adjusted change in VA at 12 months with DEX and anti-VEGF initiated groups were not statistically significantly different (BRVO: DEX + 6.7, anti-VEGF + 10.6 letters; CRVO: DEX + 2.8, anti-VEGF + 6.8 letters). DEX initiated eyes had fewer injections and visits than anti-VEGF initiated eyes. The BRVO-DEX eyes had greater initial mean changes in VA and central subfield thickness (CST) and achieved inactivity sooner than BRVO-anti-VEGF eyes. The mean CST after the first three months was above 350 µm in all but the BRVO-anti-VEGF group, suggesting undertreatment. In routine care DEX is uncommonly used when available as initial treatment of BRVO and CRVO requiring supplemental anti-VEGF within the first year. The 12-month outcomes were similar, but DEX initiated eyes had fewer injections and visits but more episodes of raised IOP Vs those starting anti-VEGF.

Effect of Intravitreal Aflibercept on Corneal Endothelial Cells.

AIM:  To determine the effect of repeated intravitreal injections of aflibercept on the corneal endothelium in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) and macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS:  In a prospective study conducted between January 2021 and November 2023, a total of 87 treatment-naive eyes with DME and RVO were evaluated. The exclusion criteria were surgery or laser intervention during the follow-up period, contact lens wear, cataract surgery in the last 6 months, dystrophy, or other corneal condition that may cause endothelial damage. In addition to routine examinations on the day of application, we also measured the corneal endothelium using specular microscopy on the 1st, 4th and 8th day of injection. We evaluated 4 parameters: endothelial cell density (CD), hexagonality (HEX), coefficient of variability (CV) and central corneal thickness (CCT). First of all, we evaluated the entire cohort of eyes, and then divided it according to 2 criteria; the diagnosis into DME/RVO and according to the lens status into phakic/pseudophakic eyes. RESULTS:  A total of 87 eyes of 68 patients were evaluated. The average age of the patients at the time of diagnosis was 66.8 ±9.3 years. Within the cohort 51 (59%) eyes were phakic and 36 (41%) pseudophakic. A total of 61 (70%) eyes with a diagnosis of DME were treated, and 26 (30%) with RVO. During the follow-up, there were no significant changes in the average values of CD, HEX, CV, CCT due to aflibercept treatment, either in the whole group or in subgroups according to diagnosis or lens condition. CONCLUSIONS:  The results of this study suggest that intravitreal administration of aflibercept in patients with DME and RVO did not have an impact on corneal endothelial parameters, including CCT, HEX, CD and CV. These parameters were measured using endothelial microscopy during an 8-injection observation period.

Aflibercept 5+PRN with retinal laser photocoagulation is more effective than retinal laser photocoagulation alone and aflibercept 3+PRN with retinal laser photocoagulation in patients with high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema: a 12-month clinical trial.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate and compare the efficacy and safety of retinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) alone, PRP with aflibercept 3+PRN, and PRP with aflibercept 5+PRN in patients with both high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: Overall, 170 patients with high-risk PDR and DME (170 eyes from 170 patients) who visited our ophthalmology clinic from December 2018 to December 2020 were divided into the PRP (n=58), aflibercept 5+PRN with PRP (n=53), and aflibercept 3+PRN with PRP (n= 59) groups. General information, such as age, sex, and eye category, was obtained. Moreover, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), baseline central macular foveal thickness (CFT), microaneurysm (MA), area of neovascularization (NV), area of hard exudate (HE), and cytokine levels in atrial fluid before and after treatment, were assessed. The χ2 test was used for comparison between groups for statistical data. Analysis of variance was used for the statistical description of measurement data, independent samples were analyzed using Student's t-test, and Student-Newman-Keuls test was used for group comparisons. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. Results: After treatment, no significant improvement in the BCVA (logMAR) of patients in the PRP group was observed. The BCVA (log MAR) decreased from 0.72 ± 0.17 and 0.74 ± 0.17 to 0.50 ± 0.13 and 0.53 ± 0.17 in PRP with aflibercept 5+PRN and PRP with aflibercept 3+PRN groups, respectively, with a statistically significant difference compared to those in the PRP group (P<0.05 in all cases). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the combined treatment groups (P>0.05). The CFT in the PRP-only group decreased slightly from 361.80 ± 36.70 µm to 353.86 ± 40.88 µm, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05), whereas the CFT in the aflibercept 5+PRN with PRP and aflibercept 3+PRN with PRP groups decreased from 356.57 ± 37.57 µm and 358.17 ± 44.66 µm to 284.87 ± 31.52 µm and 303.19 ± 37.00 µm, respectively, with statistically significant differences before and after treatment (P<0.05 for both groups). Statistically significant differences were observed in CFT between the three groups after treatment (P<0.05 in all cases). The number of MA (pcs) in the PRP, aflibercept 5+PRN with PRP, and aflibercept 3+PRN with PRP groups decreased from 118.34 ± 27.96, 118.60 ± 33.34, and 116.59 ± 28.95 to 92.95 ± 29.04, 44.60 ± 20.73, and 54.26 ± 25.43, respectively. The two-way comparison of the three groups revealed statistically significant differences in MA (P<0.05 in all cases). In the three groups, NV decreased from 1.00 ± 0.21 mm², 1.01 ± 0.18 mm², and 0.98 ± 0.20 mm² before treatment to 0.49 ± 0.17 mm², 0.31 ± 0.16 mm², and 0.38 ± 0.14 mm², respectively, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05 in all cases). After 12 months of treatment, 13, 18, and 18 patients had reduced HE area in the PRP-only, aflibercept 5+PRN with PRP, and aflibercept 3+PRN with PRP groups, respectively, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05 in all cases). After 12 months of treatment, vascular endothelial growth factor, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and glial fibrilliary acidic protein levels (pg/mL) in the aqueous humor decreased in both combined treatment groups compared with that at baseline, with statistically significant differences; however, no significant difference was observed between the two combined treatment groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Aflibercept 5+PRN combined with PRP was safe and effective in treating patients with high-risk PDR and DME, and was more effective than PRP-only and aflibercept 3+PRN with PRP in improving CFT and MA.

Visual acuity prediction on real-life patient data using a machine learning based multistage system.

In ophthalmology, intravitreal operative medication therapy (IVOM) is a widespread treatment for diseases related to the age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the diabetic macular edema, as well as the retinal vein occlusion. However, in real-world settings, patients often suffer from loss of vision on time scales of years despite therapy, whereas the prediction of the visual acuity (VA) and the earliest possible detection of deterioration under real-life conditions is challenging due to heterogeneous and incomplete data. In this contribution, we present a workflow for the development of a research-compatible data corpus fusing different IT systems of the department of ophthalmology of a German maximum care hospital. The extensive data corpus allows predictive statements of the expected progression of a patient and his or her VA in each of the three diseases. For the disease AMD, we found out a significant deterioration of the visual acuity over time. Within our proposed multistage system, we subsequently classify the VA progression into the three groups of therapy "winners", "stabilizers", and "losers" (WSL classification scheme). Our OCT biomarker classification using an ensemble of deep neural networks results in a classification accuracy (F1-score) of over 98%, enabling us to complete incomplete OCT documentations while allowing us to exploit them for a more precise VA modelling process. Our VA prediction requires at least four VA examinations and optionally OCT biomarkers from the same time period to predict the VA progression within a forecasted time frame, whereas our prediction is currently restricted to IVOM/no therapy. We achieve a final prediction accuracy of 69% in macro average F1-score, while being in the same range as the ophthalmologists with 57.8 and 50 ± 10.7 % F1-score.

Ranibizumab Biosimilars in Treating Retinal Disorders: A Cost-Effective Revolution?

Ranibizumab, is a humanized, monoclonal antibody fragment that binds and inactivates vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) and VEGF-B. One of the main indications for an intravitreal treatment with ranibizumab is age-related macular degeneration (AMD), which is a retinal disease with a high worldwide socioeconomic impact. Biosimilars constitute biological products that demonstrate similar pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics with a reference product, as well as comparable clinical efficacy, safety and immunogenicity. Since the approval of the first biosimilar Razumab, there has been a variety of new biosimilars available on the market. They offer the advantage of the same good clinical and safety results at a better price. All Ranibizumab biosimilars that have gained approval were tested in double masked Phase 3 clinical studies. The use of Ranibizumab biosimilars in neovascular AMD is well reported in the bibliography. Nevertheless, over the last few years, there is a tendency of using biosimilars in other retinal diseases like retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), diabetic macular edema (DME) or polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). In conclusion, ranibizumab biosimilars offer a promising avenue for the management of retinal diseases, especially in countries with lower socioeconomic status, where there is lack of availability of innovator ranibizumab. However, further research is required to fully explore their efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes in a plethora of retinal diseases.

Does dexamethasone implant combination with aflibercept monotherapy affect one-year outcomes in treatment-naive diabetic macular edema with inflammatory biomarkers?

PURPOSE: To compare the anatomical and functional outcomes of the combination of aflibercept and dexamethasone implant (CT) against aflibercept monotherapy (AM) in treatment-naive diabetic macular edema (DME) patients with serous macular detachment and hyperreflective foci. METHODS: This study included 82 eyes of 82 patients with treatment-naive DME who completed the follow-up period of 12 months. All patients had optical coherence tomography biomarkers of an inflammatory DME phenotype. Patients were consecutively selected and classified into two groups: The CT group consisted of 39 eyes treated with aflibercept therapy and initially combined with a single-dose dexamethasone implant. The AM group consisted of 43 eyes treated with aflibercept alone. The primary outcome measures of the study were the mean reduction of the central macular thickness (CMT) and total macular volume parameters (TMV) and improvement in best-corrected visual acuity. RESULTS: In both groups, the patient characteristics, including age, gender, duration of diabetes, HbA1c levels, phakic percentage, and diabetic retinopathy status were similar (P > 0.05). The mean reduction in CMT and TMV was significantly higher in the CT group compared to the AM group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). In contrast, mean letter gains were not significantly higher (P = 0.240) at the end of the study. In the CT group, 20.5% of patients showed a transient IOP increase, and 18% developed cataracts. In subgroup analysis, the mean letter gain in pseudophakic eyes was significantly higher (12.5 in the CT vs. 9.3 in the AM group, P = 0.027). CONCLUSION: The CT, where inflammation is prominent, can provide faster recovery. The pseudophakic eyes seem to be the ideal patient group for CT.

Protocolo de tratamiento del edema macular quístico asociado a retinosis pigmentaria y otras distrofias hereditarias de la retina / Protocol for the treatment of cystoid macular edema secondary to retinitis pigmentosa and other inherited retinal dystrophies

Las distrofias hereditarias de la retina (DHR) son la causa principal de ceguera legal en la población laboral. El edema macular quístico (EMQ) es una de las causas tratables de pérdida visual afectando hasta un 50% de los pacientes. Se ha realizado una revisión bibliográfica combinando «inherited retinal dystrophy», «retinitis pigmentosa», «macular oedema» y un protocolo diagnóstico/terapéutico según los niveles de evidencia y recomendaciones de la «US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality». Este protocolo se ha discutido en las reuniones mensuales del grupo XAREA DHR con la participación de más de 25 profesionales, creando un documento de consenso. La etiología del EMQ es multifactorial: disfunción de la barrera hematorretiniana, del epitelio pigmentario de la retina y de las células de Müller, inflamación y tracción vítrea. La OCT es la prueba de elección para el diagnóstico y seguimiento del EMQ asociado a las DHR. Los fármacos con mayor grado de evidencia científica son los inhibidores de la anhidrasa carbónica (IAC). Los corticoides, anti-VEGF intravítreos y vitrectomía con pelado de la membrana limitante interna no disponen de suficiente evidencia. Se propone un esquema de tratamiento en el EMQ en las DHR en adultos, otro para pacientes pediátricos y otra en las DHR y cirugía de catarata. Los IAC orales y tópicos son efectivos en el tratamiento del EMQ secundario a las DHR. El tratamiento con corticoides, anti-VEGF y vitrectomía son opciones de segunda línea. Se requieren ensayos clínicos aleatorizados para poder establecer la escala terapéutica en estos pacientes.(AU)

Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRD) are the leading cause of legal blindness in the working population. Cystic macular edema (CME) is one of the treatable causes of visual loss, affecting up to 50% of the patients. A bibliographic review has been carried out combining “inherited retinal dystrophy”, “retinitis pigmentosa”, “macular edema” and a diagnostic-therapeutic protocol according to the levels of evidence and recommendations of the “US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality”. This protocol has been discussed in the monthly meetings of the XAREA DHR group with the participation of more than 25 experts, creating a consensus document. The etiology of CME is multifactorial: dysfunction of the blood-retinal barrier, retinal pigment epithelium, and Müller cells, inflammation, and vitreous traction.OCT is the test of choice for the diagnosis and follow-up of CME associated with IRD. The drugs with the highest degree of scientific evidence are carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (IAC). Intravitreal corticosteroids, anti-VEGF, and vitrectomy with peeling of the internal limiting membrane do not have sufficient evidence. A treatment scheme is proposed for the CME in IRD in adults, another for pediatric patients and an another for IRD and cataract surgery. Oral and topical IACs are effective in the treatment of CME secondary to IRD. Treatment with corticosteroids, anti-VEGF, and vitrectomy are second-line options. Randomized clinical trials are required to establish the therapeutic scale in these patients.(AU)